Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Will I have never had a court case OR eye surgery, I have 20/ 20 vision. WTF are you talking about? I expect an apology. Jerry Will wrote: > Why would I want to do what you suggest? I have a funkey > 1930s enlarger which came with a lens which is of about the > same age. The only reason I keep any semblance of a wet > darkroom is to use this lens and this enlarger. While my > friends on the IRC send me post cards printed conventially, > I get a hoot out of printing postcards on Ilford postcard > paper in b&w. And my method of choice is the 1930's > enlarger. > > And after reading your court case regarding you eye surgery, > I am surprised that you can tell the difference. > > Regards, Bill Larsen > Terra Bella, CA > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 21:57 > Subject: Re: [Leica] Focomat Ia > > | Rich und Will > | > | Yes, the old E. Leitz NY lenses were not coated. They > were made > | by Woolensock and were awful! Get a good modern lens made > by > | Rodenstock, Schneider or Nikor and you will get results > equal to > | the worlds best. They all make lenses that screw right > in. Don't > | handicap yourself. The enlarger is capable of superb > results! > | > | Jerry > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html