Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks all! I usually don't enlarge greater than a 6"x8". But who knows, one day I might get a wild hair and start doing murals, like an 11"x14". I think that the $1.60 difference between the two at B&H isn't worth the sacrifice in quality. Something I always ranted about in regards to Efke film. Slobodan Dimitrov - ---------- >From: "Dan States" <dstate1@hotmail.com> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji SS vs ACROS >Date: Fri, Aug 8, 2003, 7:20 AM > > The difference is dramatic. SS is an old film that was fairly grainy and > unsharp. It needs to be used at 50 asa and under developed to keep grain in > check. > > ACROS is an up to date, fine grain film. It can be used at 80-100 asa and > has very fine, even grain structure. It is light years ahead of SS. (as > it should be) > > I still have a bunch of SS I havent used. It's just not up to the modern > films like Tmax100. > > Best wishes > Dan States > Grand Forks ND > > >>From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net> >>Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>CC: leica_reflex_forum@topica.com >>Subject: [Leica] Fuji SS vs ACROS >>Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 08:53:38 -0700 >> >>Both are 100 ISO films, but has anyone seen an appreciable difference >>between the two? >>TIA, >> Slobodan Dimitrov >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html