Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ben - I too would want faster lenses - just have to experiment and find faster film that you like. My last vacation to Colorado was done using the Xpan - used Kodak Porta 400 UC ( Ultra Color) and TCN 400 for BW. I did not need to shoot indoors and there was gobs of light in Colorado so it was never a problem. What is a problem with the Xpan is the poor visibility of the under - over and correct exposure LEDs. I wonder if this has been corrected in the new Xpan II? It is refreshing in this respect to use the M7 and have the numbers so sharp and readable. ernie On Monday, July 21, 2003, at 09:23 AM, BenMarks@aol.com wrote: > Ha! LOL. Ernie, I'm sure you are right. Still, you can always hope > that some inventive machinist has put some thought into it. > > I wouldn't want to suggest, here of all places, that I was trying to > figure out a way NOT to buy an M7. You know, I have put my hands on > half a dozen Hexar RFs in the vain hopes of saving a few $$, just to > play, and (pace Dante) I have not been able to get the focus markings > on my lenses, while on the Hexar, duplicate those on my M6/M4-P/M3 > (same subject/same distance and all of that). It is true that I have > not taken a single picture with the Hexar RF together with one of my > lenses, and that my test was anything but scientific, but the observed > differences on the focus scales of my lenses made me leery of plunking > down good money (which, after all, will probably be needed to go > towards an M7 someday anyway). Also, I didn't LOVE the rangefinder > (not as snappy as my Leicas or even my Bessa R). Incidentally, I have > been to Dante's website and love his pics taken with the Hexar, but I > just couldn't pull the trigger. > > So when I had the XPan out the other day, I found myself thinking > "what if . . . " > > In all probability, the price of having someone design and machine a > one-off adapter would dwarf the cost of an M7 (certainly it would be > more than the cost of a Hexar RF). Still, I'm one of those odd-balls > who looks at the adapter page on Stephen Gandy's site and starts > thinking of amusing combinations. I know, it's a sickness. ;) > > >> Ben - I don't wanna be too flip but the adapter your speaking of is >> called a Hexar RF :) > >> I doubt very much that there exists an adapter such as you >describe. >> I don't think the Xpan designers ever thought of the >camera as >> being used for low light , street photography > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html