Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Aram Cost per exposure. I am not considering digital, BTW, just film. Jerry langhans wrote: > Jerry > > I've often hear that, but if I add up all my costs in film over the last 30 > years it far exceeds the cost of my equipment. Why is digital catching on? > Aside from the time issue, I have heard many say that the savings in film > pays for their digital cameras in as little as a year. > > Aram > > > Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:27:21 -0700 > > From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Bulk loading (long!) > > Message-ID: <3F188259.946ED176@pacbell.net> > > References: <005001c34d66$f5e822e0$3e23fea9@ccasony01> > > > > LUGers > > > > As my Photo Club mentor at the Bronx High School of Science > > said 55 years ago: "Film is the cheapest item in photography, time > > is the dearest". > > > > Jerry > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html