Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/07/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Opinions requested: Latest and greatest in scanners and related software
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:56:28 -0500
References: <127.0.0.1+oTAx4mhDOWuEDeG7JYkHMo@all-1.inet.it> <5e1101c3495a$6557e810$347a5443@userwq4hf2h43s> <008701c349c1$e794a4a0$351889ac@aoldsl.net> <007301c34a04$36320c00$f419530c@MacPhisto>
Chris:
> I went with the Canon scanner over Nikon because
>of what Digital ICE does to images. ICE softens the image way too much where
>Canon's FARE does not.
To add to this, if you're shooting silver-based B&W negatives, you can't use
any of the IR channel technology, anyway. If you're processing your own
film, you can probably do so without worrying about dust and scratch
removal. It's easier to create good negatives than it is to use technology
to get decent scans from bad ones. :)
Eric
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from "bokma@katamail.com" <bokma@katamail.com> ([Leica] Leica IIIf)
Message from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> ([Leica] Opinions requested: Latest and greatest in scanners and related software)
Message from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Opinions requested: Latest and greatest in scanners and related software)
Message from "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> (Re: [Leica] Opinions requested: Latest and greatest in scanners and related software)