Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Opinions Please 135mm lens for M
From: Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 18:49:43 -0400
References: <3.0.2.32.20030709231531.01086a14@pop.infionline.net> <3.0.2.32.20030710223348.010826f4@pop.infionline.net> <p05100300bb33ed2f9229@[10.0.1.4]> <3.0.2.32.20030712154622.01a5617c@pop.infionline.net>

At 03:05 PM 7/12/03 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Marc;
>Would you happen to know if the rear element of the 135 Elmar is
asymmetrical?

I am absolutely convinced that it is not asymmetrical, as Leita made so
much of the assymetrical element in the original 1.2/50 Noctilux.  As Leitz
never claimed any assymetric qualities for the 4/135 Elmar -- or Tele-Elmar
- -- they probably didn't have such.

Marc

msmall@infionline.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Opinions Please 135mm lens for M)
In reply to: Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] Opinions Please 135mm lens for M)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] Opinions Please 135mm lens for M)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Opinions Please 135mm lens for M)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] Opinions Please 135mm lens for M)