Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
bdcolen@earthlink.net (bdcolen)6/26/03
>Do the math, George - Your 85 I going to turn into a 119...
OK, BD: I believe the math would go something like this
85 x 1.37 = 116.45mm - as in all things - compromise will find the middle way
I still like the idea of a 116.5mm 1.4. :-)
In fact if I go on down the list of my R glass:
the 21 would actually get more use as the 29mm it would become
35 would do fine as a 48
60 macro as 82 - I really like this alot
180 as 247 - now this one Iıve got a serious problem with - looks like Iıll have to get a 135, never thought Iıd say that - as 135 is the one focal length Iıve never liked.
400 as 548 - I like this alot
then of course we can add the 1.4x and 2x for additional fun
As far as my not being close enough - judge my images on their merit or lack there of - not my position in the world - when I want close - I get close.
Fond regards,
G e o r g e L o t t e r m o s e r, imagist
<>Peace<> <>Harmony<> <>Stewardship<>
Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
since 1975
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
web <www.imagist.com>
eMail george@imagist.com
voice 262 241 9375
fax 262 241 9398
Lotter Moser & Associates
10050 N Port Washington Rd - Mequon, WI 53092
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html