Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you are correct. This will carry them over the next few years and in the meantime they can learn more etc and deploy a full digital later when cost have come down for them as well and when the whole digital landscape has stabilized a bit more. I think they needed to do this to show that they are not dead and are not giving up on their R line. I think they needed to proof that to the market place and potential new system buyers. Bas - ----- Original Message ----- From: <Teresa299@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:50 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital Back - I like the first step! > > In a message dated 6/26/03 11:18:15 AM, mvhoward@mac.com writes: > > << Again, you're missing the point: A Ferrari Enzo, or Aston-Martin > Vanquish offers something that no-one else does: the experience is > UNIQUE. If you drop around $1M on an Enzo (should you be one of the > select few whom Ferrari allows to buy one), it's because it is a > completely unique product. The same is true, but to a slightly lesser > extent, of the Vanquish. >> > > Yes, well you seem to be missing the point that this digital back thingie > fits onto the back of a LEcia R9. If you appreciate Leica glass then you think > of it as a ferrari or something germanically exotic. Or maybe you don't. > > <<What I find bizarre is that Leica as a company > choose to pursue an overpriced, outdated technology, for a minimal > market, without actually offering any benefit over competitors of any > kind -- except, of course, a red roundel. > > Or maybe they just consider themselves in a league of their own and > they don't have competitors.>> > > I'm not sure, but I'd hazard a guess that Leica doesn't quite have the RD > resources that Canon does. Maybe I'm wrong. But it seems like all the big > players are playing catchup to Canon's wrap-up of marketing/advertising/get there > first strategy. If the big guys like olympus pentax minolta/konica nikon are > having a time of it, do you really expect Leica to produce some cutting edge > stand alone tech that now creates three major lines, the M, the R and the D > series? I suspect they decided to employ this strategy hoping that it gives them > a few years to stay positioned in the SLR/D marketplace, and perhaps even pick > up some new users who can no longer buy traditional SLR's because some of the > older camera makers are discontinuing them. Realistically, who knows how > long the now major digital players will be putting RD into new traditional > camera bodies. > > Maybe I'm wrong and someone with greater marketing experience and knowledge > of the camera industry can offer an accurate view of the situation. > > -kim > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html