Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's more economical because, like it or not, having photos in digital form is critical. In my case, the majority of my published work has been in digital form. I just completed scanning a large body of work - around 2800 images. With all the problems I had with the bulk slide feeder, the work took almost 9 months - so much time wasted that could have been used making more images. Once you add up your time sitting in front of the film scanner, $10-20k for new digital gear doesn't sound like alot of money. Digital saves you time...alot of time. And that's time that can be used shooting or, more importantly, drumming up new buisiness. Film is beautiful but time consuming. - --Jim - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 10:43 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Oh ... It's COMING SOON! :-) > > Subject: RE: [Leica] Oh ... It's COMING SOON! :-) > > > > If it is true that this is really the Leica digital answer, I will be > > switching to Canon for my SLR digital photography. Probably the 1DS since > > it is most sturdy model. It's about the same price as the proposed refit > > for the R8 with all the advantages of autofocus and lenses designed for > > digital. My purpose in using digital is economy, convenience, economy, > > immediate results, economy, easy transport through airports, economy, > > PowerPoint presentations, economy, CD storage vs slides, economy, and > stock > > sales. > > I am simply amazed at what people will spend for a little convenience and > instant gratification. How exactly is spending $7000 for a digital camera > that will need an upgrade in 18 months, and how many more $1000's on new > glass square with a desire for "economy." What is economical about such a > purchase? What exactly is so horrible about a film camera? You can spend > $2K on a film scanner with an auto film loader from that "N" company and get > pretty much the same result (without the instant gratification) and still > use the best glass in the world---and save a good $10-15K in the process. > Am I missing something here or has the world gone completely mad? > > Gary > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html