Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John, Thanks for the tip... I have one more lens that I can test. Harland On Wednesday, April 23, 2003, at 12:31 PM, John Collier wrote: > Lenses and bodies that are adjusted correctly, mix and match with no > problems. So either your 90 needs its rangefinder cam adjusted or your > 50 and the camera need to be adjusted. My first Leica was an M2 with a > 50/2. Everything worked well until I added another lens and then the > rangefinder was out with the new lens. In the end it turned out to be > the 50 that was needed adjustment and the body had been adjusted to > match that lens. I reset the body for the new lens and sent the 50 in > for a CLA. When it came back, it coupled correctly. Try several lenses > that are known to be good and you should be able to quickly find out > which of your gear needs work. > > John Collier > > On Wednesday, April 23, 2003, at 08:49 AM, harland harris wrote: > >> When the rf alignment is off at infinity, will it be more pronounced >> with a 90mm lens than a 50mm? >> I have an issue where the alignment with the 50mm appears to be okay >> - or just a smudge off - but with the 90, it's noticeable not >> aligning, eg the lens hits infinity and stops turning but the two >> images are not fully aligned. >> >> My assumption is to check the rf alignment and that the 90mm is okay. > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html