Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Leica DSLR
From: "Randy Jensen" <randy@jamzcheer.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:10:54 -0800

<<<<<Btw I heard some of those much vaunted R lenses are actually rebadged
Sigmas?? If so I wouldn't want to go near any of them :)

Actually, I think this only applies to the 28-70 Vario-Elmar.  Some of the
early designs were partnerships with Minolta of some kind also.

Because of this the 28-70 is not received very well.  However, I own one
(got an amazing deal on it) and I use it a lot.  Because of its convenience
I will often get a shot with it that I blow up to 16x20 or so and the lens
looks GREAT.  Even though it's a Sigma design, it's under Leica's quality
control, so maybe the design is great, but Sigma's quality control sucks.

I know the 16 fisheye is a Minolta design, yet it rates as one of the best
in lens tests for 35mm fisheye lenses, far above the Minolta brand one.

My $0.02

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Red Dawn
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:00 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Leica DSLR





- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Johnny
Deadman
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica DSLR

>MTF frequency is only one part of the story. Cameras like the 1Ds are
>EXTREMELY unforgiving of lenses. It's simply wrong to say it doesn't
>matter what lens you use because sharpness at the edges and the
>correction of chromatic aberration have nothing to do with center MTF
>frequency. The 1Ds sensor outperforms all but the very best lenses when

>you consider the whole field of view.

Hi John

That correlates to my experiences with a D30 for about a year - there is
a significant difference between putting a top of the line Sigma lens as
opposed to an original Canon L lens - differences that can be easily
observed in the form of image quality.

Btw I heard some of those much vaunted R lenses are actually rebadged
Sigmas?? If so I wouldn't want to go near any of them :)

Boon Hwee




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Leica DSLR)
Reply from "Red Dawn" <reddawn@singnet.com.sg> ([Leica] was Leica DSLR, now L or R glass?)