Re: [Leica] PMA 2003

[Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>]

BD

Again, agreed, but didn't someone write something 'bout a new
MD model Leica.

Or did they mean a Leica that only a MD could afford? :-)

Jerry

bdcolen wrote:

> I'd say that if one was honestly assessing PMA, and one saw Leica's
> black paint M6 with an M3 rewind knob, with it's not-as-well-made at
> twice-the-price version of Tom A's Rapidwinder, and then looked at what
> Canon, Olympus, and others were showing, one would say that Leica
> did indeed "not have much to show." ;-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of John
> Collier
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:18 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] PMA 2003
>
> Didn't they have the MP and new Leicavit-M there?
>
> John Collier
>
> On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 04:03 PM, Joseph Codispoti wrote:
>
> > Leica had very little to show and generated only mild interest among
> > the
> > public.
> > I did make contact with Leica's VP of operations who asked for
> > ClearSight
> > samples.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html