Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:54:59 -0800
References: <20030225011413.97780.qmail@web40807.mail.yahoo.com> <038501c2dc6f$2236ea20$6401a8c0@oemcomputer> <3E5AD8A2.AEAD6092@pacbell.net> <000501c2dd32$037b22e0$ab4179a5@mindspring.com>

Gary

TA has been snubbed by Leica not buying his design outright,
as I know it is superior to the original Leicavit as used on the
old MP.  The NIH Syndrome, I guess.

Jerry

Gary Williams wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3
>
> > Don
> >
> > Right!  Clockwork motors!  Now that Leica has re-instituted the
> > Leicavit and essentially snubbed Tom Abrahamson
>
> How exactly has Tom been snubbed?  He will still produce a better product
> (and with a lifetime guarantee) that the Leicavit and at half the price to
> the consumer!
>
> Gary
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
In reply to: Message from Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)