Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3
From: "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:39:34 -0500
References: <20030225011413.97780.qmail@web40807.mail.yahoo.com> <038501c2dc6f$2236ea20$6401a8c0@oemcomputer> <3E5AD8A2.AEAD6092@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3
> Don
>
> Right! Clockwork motors! Now that Leica has re-instituted the
> Leicavit and essentially snubbed Tom Abrahamson
How exactly has Tom been snubbed? He will still produce a better product
(and with a lifetime guarantee) that the Leicavit and at half the price to
the consumer!
Gary
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
In reply to:
Message from Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Question: Single Stroke vs. Double Stroke M3)