Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: teachers and other public employees
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:21:13 +0100
References: <200302122250.OAA19507@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <001a01c2d3c4$82573800$0b87bbd8@pcr>

langhans wrote:
 > Believe me is is NOT that they TRY to be everything to everybody, it
 > is that society is FORCING more and more rolls on the schools

I assume you meant that society is forcing more ROLES on the schools...

 > After all, teachers love kids or they
 > wouldn't be doing their job, since God knows the could earn more
 > money elsewhere.

Some could, others could not. My wife has a relative in New Jersey who 
teaches in an inner city Newark school--obviously not an easy 
environment, but she is certainly rewarded financially to a much greater 
extent than if she were teaching in a regular suburb public school, or 
in most other jobs she could realistically get with her degree in 
education (let's face it, it is one of the easier majors at most U.S. 
universities).

Yes, teachers are extremely important, as are nurses, firefighters etc., 
but how are we to decide whether they earn "too little?" What does "too 
little" mean in this context? In a market economy such matters are 
decided by supply and demand (yes, I know that there are unions and 
other factors that have an influence on the wage formation, but 
fundamentally my statement still stands). The reason a corporate VP 
earns more than a teacher is that there are fewer people capable of 
performing that job relative to the demand for such people. Nothing 
else. And that is also the reason why a top-class NBA player earns more 
than a corporate VP. It has nothing to with the intrinsic value of their 
work in any moral sense. It is simply a capitalist economy at work.

In connection with the on-and-off firefighter strikes in the UK the 
employers (i.e. local governments) have pointed out that there are on 
average 40 applications for each opening--hardly an indication that 
firefighters are "underpaid." Contrast that with the severe shortage of 
nursing staff in the UK. Based on this, I would say that UK firefighters 
earn enough, while UK nurses earn too little. Again, nothing to do with 
whose work is harder or more valuable to society, simply a matter of 
supply and demand.

Nathan

- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2003.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "langhans" <langhans@compwrx.com> ([Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V24 #63)