Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tom, I use a Nikon LS-2000 which I have had for 4 years now, and I am very happy with it. I am sure that the other scanners you are considering are good too. One of the main determinants of your results will be the scanner software. The software that comes with Nikon scanners is not very good, and like many other Nikon owners, I have replaced it with Vuescan, at $40 one of the best values in the digital darkroom. Nathan Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com wrote: > Hello to all. > > Now that I have a working M7 with 35 and 75 Summilux lenses, I am working > toward a digital darkroom of sorts. > > After researching the LUG archives and other sources, I purchased the Epson > 2200 printer. I am learning right now from various sources how to use this > great printer. There is definitely a learning curve to this level of > printing. > > My next addition will be a film scanner and I have also been searching the > archives and websites for feedback and reviews. > > My price range is around $1100 or less. I want at least 4000dpi with a > density factor of 4 dMax or greater. > > I will be running this on a windows 2000 platform and would like USB > connectivity for ease of use. SCSI is also OK since I have an SCSI card. > > I have narrowed my choices down to three scanners that seem to meet this > criteria, but would love to have some basic feedback or opinions based upon > experienced users. Especially since the software has been updated most > likely on all three of these since they first came out. > > I am looking at the Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 Plus, and it's near clone by > MicroTek, the ArtixScan 4000tf. Of these two, I favor the Polaroid since it > comes with the SilverFast software which I understand to be quite good. > > I am also considering the Nikon SuperCoolscan 4000 ED even though it uses > fire wire and is a little more expensive than my budget (it currently has a > $200 rebate). I would have to get an adaptor to convert it to USB. > > I have read many good things about the Polaroid and a few not so good. All > of the reviews were based upon the original 4000 and not the new Plus > version. The new Plus version is even better with a greater optical density > and bit rate. > > I have not read very much about the MicroTek and understand that MicroTek > actually makes the Polaroid so they are very similar. > > The Nikon is also highly rated, but I have read several reviews that it has > some known flaws. One of which was the software creating noise in the darker > dynamic range and another about slides scanning with a little distortion. > > I know that film scanners have been much discussed here on the LUG, but that > is because they are becoming such an important piece of equipment and are > ever changing. > > I know there are other scanners in this price range that I may have > overlooked and would also appreciate any feedback on these as well. > > Please feel free to respond to me off list if you would prefer. > > Thanks > > Tom Henson > Tom.henson@bakerbotts.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch mobile: +41 78 732 1430 Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2003.htm General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html