Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alastair Can I ask a stupid question? When you say that you had no problem stitching the two scans together, does that mean that the join was totally invisible? I've looked at the examples on your website but it's difficult to judge much from a photograph on the web. What software did you use for the scan. Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Alastair Firkin Sent: 28 December 2002 04:06 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Way Off Topic Hasselblad Xpan Camera I wrote a "comprehensive" review of the X-pan when I first got one. I did not have and have not used the 30mm lens, and for me the addition of the 90 made the system far more useful. My one BIG complaint remains the lens mount: it cannot have been "impossible" to have made it with an M mount, but only "allow" the Panoramic format via some electronic wizardary, and then the camera would have been an ideal "electronic" M, could have been part of my travel kit etc etc. I think I stand by my comments ;-) I will soon have a dedicated holder for the enlarger, I never really had any problem scanning with a 35mm scanner and putting the two scans together. Nice camera, needed more versatility for mine. for the "old" review, I have put it up on the web again http://stairfirkin.com/xpan/usingXpan.html Cheers - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html