Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug

["SML" <leirex@access4less.net>]

If you don't mind using SM-M adapter, the Canon 135/3.5 and the Nikon
135/3.5 are excellent choice at a bargain price.  I would go for one of
these two.

Regards,
David

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug


No Sonny,
I am not ignoring the advices. I know the quality of russian lenses.......
excellent or a dog depending on your luck. I think the Apo-Telyt-M would be
the best of course or the tele-elmar but I have not 350$ or more to buy
them.
That is why I was asking for LOW COST 135mm lens.
Rafael

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "(SonC) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug


> Rafel,
> While I think the Cameraquest site is excellent in all respects, my
question
> to you is why did you start this thread on a Leica list if you intended to
> ignore all the kind people who bothered to answer your question?
>
> Sonny
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
>
>
> > Thank you all for your advices.
> > I visited the www.cameraquest.com and Stephen Gandy says that Elmar is
not
> > very sharp lens and Hektor chrome (coated) is not a very good lens
(prone
> to
> > fogging). I have the posibility to buy a Late Canon 135 3.5 lens (not
> > senerar but later version) for 150 $ in mint condition.
> > Following Stephen Gandy recommendation the best 135mm SM lenses are
Nikon
> > and Canon
> > Any experiences with this lens,
> > Rafael
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <ned@kajabbi.com>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > Don't forget the 135 F2.8 Elmarit. Due to its weight it's VERY
> > undervalued.
> > > If you can handle the Noctilux, the Elmarit is a breeze and it cuts a
> > super
> > > sharp image.
> > > >-- Original Message --
> > > >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:21:01 +1100
> > > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > >From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
> > > >Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> > > >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Hi all,
> > > >>I am looking for a 135mm lens for my M6. My budget is not full, so I
> am
> > > >>looking for a good, cheap lens. As far as I know there are 3 options
> in
> > > >SM
> > > >>lenses:
> > > >>Canon 135mm 3.5
> > > >>Nikon 135mm 3.5
> > > >>Hektor 135mm 4
> > > >>What would be your choice?
> > > >
> > > >135mm Tele-elmar not too expensive, and just fabulous and I mean
great
> > > lens
> > > >--
> > > >Alastair Firkin
> > > >
> > > >http://www.afirkin.com
> > > >
> > > >http://www.familyofman2.com
> > > >
> > > >  ()" "'()
> > > >  (   '0',)
> > > >(,,)(")(")
> > > >--
> > > >To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! Messenger
> > Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
> > Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html