Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug
From: "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:53:59 -0600
References: <3DD3F774000020E1@mta07.san.yahoo.com> <00bf01c28e36$6d6ddd50$70a72350@home>

Rafel,
While I think the Cameraquest site is excellent in all respects, my question
to you is why did you start this thread on a Leica list if you intended to
ignore all the kind people who bothered to answer your question?

Sonny




- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens


> Thank you all for your advices.
> I visited the www.cameraquest.com and Stephen Gandy says that Elmar is not
> very sharp lens and Hektor chrome (coated) is not a very good lens (prone
to
> fogging). I have the posibility to buy a Late Canon 135 3.5 lens (not
> senerar but later version) for 150 $ in mint condition.
> Following Stephen Gandy recommendation the best 135mm SM lenses are Nikon
> and Canon
> Any experiences with this lens,
> Rafael
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ned@kajabbi.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
>
>
> > Hi,
> > Don't forget the 135 F2.8 Elmarit. Due to its weight it's VERY
> undervalued.
> > If you can handle the Noctilux, the Elmarit is a breeze and it cuts a
> super
> > sharp image.
> > >-- Original Message --
> > >Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:21:01 +1100
> > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > >From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
> > >Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens
> > >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > >
> > >
> > >>Hi all,
> > >>I am looking for a 135mm lens for my M6. My budget is not full, so I
am
> > >>looking for a good, cheap lens. As far as I know there are 3 options
in
> > >SM
> > >>lenses:
> > >>Canon 135mm 3.5
> > >>Nikon 135mm 3.5
> > >>Hektor 135mm 4
> > >>What would be your choice?
> > >
> > >135mm Tele-elmar not too expensive, and just fabulous and I mean great
> > lens
> > >--
> > >Alastair Firkin
> > >
> > >http://www.afirkin.com
> > >
> > >http://www.familyofman2.com
> > >
> > >  ()" "'()
> > >  (   '0',)
> > >(,,)(")(")
> > >--
> > >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger
> Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
> Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens humbug)
In reply to: Message from ned@kajabbi.com (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] 135mm lens)