Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Long v. Short focal length usage?
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 14:22:23 -0400
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNAECMKJAA.red735i@earthlink.net>

At 10:40 PM 10/5/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Hello to all,
>
>Informally, I'd appreciate hearing from folks how much, more or less, of
>your photographing is spent over 50mm and how much spent 50mm and under.
>I've grown to like my M a lot, and am thinking about my next lens, after the
>50. I promised myself not to rush into it, to see from my photographs how
>many needed a shorter or longer focal length.
>
>Many thanks, Jeffrey F.

For M's - 50mm and under 90%.  A few with the 75/1.4, an occasional one 
with the 90/2.0, my 135 is seldom out of its case.

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com

images available from:
http://www.pdiphotos.com
http://www.mira.com
http://www.agpix.com
http://www.newscom.com




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] OT Foveon Info)