Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Alastair and everybody else, > >Just want to say that I still completely endorse FOM 2. And Alastair is >making reference (below) to me from a off-list comment that I had made to >him a few weeks ago about the final results of last Years FOM 2. I had >commented to him that i thought the judging was poor, had way to much >emphasis with pictures of kids (a full 50% of last years selections has a >picture of a kid in it) and I said to him that I thought that the first >year's selections were way too "white-bread" and because of that would fail >any critical arts revue. The only other objection I have is the 'goofy' >category titles for this year's FOM 2. > >I want to make it clear that I have nothing against kids in pictures, except >in this case, with Alastair hoping for FOM 2 to evolve into a book and a >travelling exhibition, the, "oh! isn't little Mary so cute." tone will >gaurantee negative critical revue. > >As far as the 'goofy' category titles, they probably should remain the same >year-to-year, last years were okay. > >As for the judging, I do not know the answer, Alastair has suggested that we >volunteer to be judges, which I might consider doing if I knew more about >what is involved. The other thing about the final selections, Alastair as >Curator should understand that he has the power to overrule the judges >selections, and to make selections of his own which will help make FOM 2 a >critical success. > >I want to be clear that I am 100% behind Alastair's FOM 2 and will be >sending in my submissions in a few weeks. > >Regards, > >sl thanks Steve, I will be keen to see them, and will let you know more about the judging aspect when the group has made a few more comments Cheers - -- Alastair Firkin http://www.afirkin.com http://www.familyofman2.com ()" "'() ( '0',) (,,)(")(") - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html