Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: D60 vs. D100 (was Re: [Leica] Re:Re: OT: Digital wars)
From: "Sam Krneta" <skrneta@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:39:03 -0500

Thanks Logan,

I wonder when they tested the D100, as I've read that there has been
improvement since the first units shipped to testers.

Sam Krneta


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Logan
Reinwood
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:00 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: OT: D60 vs. D100 (was Re: [Leica] Re:Re: OT: Digital wars)

Hi Sam,

FYI, hereafter a copy the conclusion of the article I mentionned
earlier:

D100 strength:
- -precision of flash system (D-TTl 3D)
- -Excellent correction of electronic noise
- -Sensibility and fast AF
- -Battery life
D100 weakness:
- - soft image
- - complex menu
- - irregular exposure
- - no PC socket
- - no High speed synchro flash
- - no wireless TTL measure

D60 strength
- - excellent performance of the CMOS captor
- - fast and sensibility of AF
- - good and logiacal ergonomy
- - battery life
- - good finish (material, construction,..)
D60 weakness:
- - only 3 AF captors
- - price too high for amateur (??? D100=3000 Euros D60=3300 Euros ???)
- - electronic noise @ more than 800 iso

If you come than to the stars they give out of a max of 5:

item: D100 /EOS D60
real resolution: 4/5
electroic noise: 5/4
exposure: 4/5
flash exposure: 5/4
colors: 5/5
ergonomy:4/5
fast actions usability: 4/4
landscape: 4/5
studio functionality 4/5

Finally the main difference they noticed is the sharpness of picture,
the Canon is ahead. They noticed also that the D100 they tested is a
pre-release and that they might still be some improvments later...

Hope it helps, krgds,logan.



>From: paul.huang@sg.artemisintl.com
>Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: [Leica] Re:Re: OT: Digital wars
>Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:24:01 +0800
>
>
>Hi Sam,
>
>Sorry, I do not have any comparisons between Nikon and Canon.  My
>sentiments were on using Leica R lenses on Canon Eos.  With Nikon, you
>would not be able to do so.  Something to do with flange distance,
there is
>no room for an adaptor, you lose infinity focusing.  So I chose the
Canon
>bodies which are really good plus I get to keep using my Leica R
lenses.
>If I were to buy from scratch, it will be a toss up between the Nikon
and
>Canon. For what I love to photograph, I need long lenses and Canon
might
>win becuase of the Image Stabilisation technology.  By the way, the
Leica R
>lenses especially the Modular APO-telyts have very close focusing
distance
>which is very useful.  The 800F5.6 goes down to below 4 metres.
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Paul
>
> >Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:02:27 -0500
> >From: "Sam Krneta" <skrneta@mindspring.com>
> >Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: OT: Digital wars
> >Message-ID: <000301c21b7f$680d8bf0$2002a8c0@SAM>
> >References:
> >
> >Paul I'll ask you he same question I asked Logan, show mw the link
that
> >rates the Canon over the D100, I must have missed it,
> >
> >
> >Sam Krneta
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html