Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] My 52nd Picture of the week
From: "SonC \(Sonny Carter\)" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:10:53 -0500
References: <00bc01c21612$ea1ebaa0$9740b8c7@nsula.edu> <002a01c21619$59f33620$340110ac@ccapr.com> <012001c21621$17fec6a0$9740b8c7@nsula.edu> <009b01c21682$82558f00$340110ac@ccapr.com> <3D0EC522.2687965D@markrabiner.com>
> Mark Rabiner
>
> But 56 pixels by 80 pixels a Minox would have worked just as well. Or a
> disc Camera. Or certainly a point and shoot. That's overkill.
> A Sigma lens on 35mm film? You might as well as shoot it with a Linhof
> on 4x5!
>
>
Mark, I am not sure I understand at all what you are saying here. The pic in question played 231 X 500, and that was
cropped.
http://www.sonc.com/paw2/KCBC_oaks.htm
Sonny
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from "SonC \(Sonny Carter\)" <sonc@sonc.com> ([Leica] My 52nd Picture of the week)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] My 52nd Picture of the week)
Message from "SonC \(Sonny Carter\)" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] My 52nd Picture of the week)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] My 52nd Picture of the week)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] My 52nd Picture of the week)