Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Austin, Not quite speculation, but I do recall reading a few years ago about how TMAX 3200 had a pretty short shelf life because it was subject to fogging from some kind of background radiation, whether you stored it frozen or not. tim > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Austin > Franklin > Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 3:26 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Neopan 1600 - image deterioration over time on > unprocessed film? > > > What can anyone tell me about image deterioration, and what to do about it > (aside from obviously processing shortly after exposure) from not > processing > Neopan 1600 (or even Delta 3200) shortly after exposure? I'm looking for > factual information and/or personal experience as opposed to > speculation... > Fuji doesn't mention anything in their data sheet that I could see. > > I've never had any noticeable degradation from Tri-X or other B&W > films even > processing some 5 years after the shoot! But it appears that the higher > speed films are affected by delayed processing (like a year later). > > Thanks, > > Austin > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html