Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Neopan 1600 - image deterioration over time on unprocessed film?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:18:09 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJKEOMAKAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> What can anyone tell me about image deterioration, and what to do about it
> (aside from obviously processing shortly after exposure) from not processing
> Neopan 1600 (or even Delta 3200) shortly after exposure?  I'm looking for
> factual information and/or personal experience as opposed to speculation...
> Fuji doesn't mention anything in their data sheet that I could see.
><Snip> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Austin
> 

Austin- Neopan 1600 is my main film and i sometimes wait weeks to months
before i run it and it seems to be perfectly OK.
The Delta 3200 no on this issue. But the Neopan 1600 is ok.


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> ([Leica] Neopan 1600 - image deterioration over time on unprocessed film?)