Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D. At 04:58 PM 5/20/2002 -0400, you wrote: > From a financial standpoint, making the switch is a non-brainer. You're certainly right. But I wish it were that cut and dried! I have Canon G2. Great camera for some things. But lacking in many ways. I've learned first hand the limitations of digital. Inexpensive per frame? Absolutely. But value is relative. I made the no-brain switch to digital and I'm beginning to regret it in some ways. Digital presentation just doesn't have the same impact as a slide show. Cheaper and less effort, yes! But so is talking, so maybe I should just describe things. I've also noticed when using digital and conventional, I always end up with far more digital images. But I end up with more good shots from conventional. Quantity hasn't resulted in quality for me. Regardless of what anyone says, personal experiences says to me that chrome film is more archival than digital images. So the financial jury is still out. Dave - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html