Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600 + extol + 100 macro
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:03:07 -0700
References: <200205191615.g4JGFnN15795@panix3.panix.com> <009201c1ff55$583bc660$f77b7ad5@desktop> <lvmfeugokd9cv0mrtmtf5nltrcvb49cbj1@4ax.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020519140541.046cb9b0@pop.alink.net> <001101c1ff7f$786e2b60$633f4d18@gv.shawcable.net> <011201c1ff8d$8ecc2660$6501a8c0@we.client2.attbi.com>

James A. Gatlin asked:

>>> Out of curiosity... are you using any TMY... and did you go to XTOL for
that
> also?
> If so, what is your technique?
> I am in the process going from TMAX dev to XTOL.. and am presently
> working XTOL at 1:1 with 'gentle-er' agitation that I used with TMAX, and
> thus far, I am getting a little thin negs.<<<

Hi James,
I tried XTOL with TMAX and like you found my negs were thinner than I liked,
so I added a couple minutes, but even then I didn't like what I was seeing.
Besides I'd  used Tmax developer with the vigorous agitation required for
best results with Tmax film since the film came on the market.

And one only needs to look at the photo reproductions in "This is Our Work.
The Legacy of Sir William Osler" medical book to realize the quality of the
negatives and resulting prints.  Which of course begs the question, "Why did
I change to Tri-x and XTOL?" ;-)

I had no absolute reason for changing film and developer when I began
shooting for the new medical book, it just happened. I'd been playing around
with Tri-x and XTOL only because of some posts on the LUG and the next thing
I knew I was using Tri-x and XTOL on a regular basis. So I stayed with it,.
along with the Neopan 1600 at  ASA 1600 in XTOL for 12 -13 minutes.
ted

Ted Grant Photography Limited
www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600 + extol + 100 macro)
Reply from "James A. Gatlin" <jagatlin@attbi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600 + extol + 100 macro)
In reply to: Message from "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Try again)
Message from "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> (Re: [Leica] Try again)
Message from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> ([Leica] Update to the Hexar/Leica back focus test)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Neopan 1600 + extol + 100 macro)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600 + extol + 100 macro)
Message from "James A. Gatlin" <jagatlin@attbi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600 + extol + 100 macro)