Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What point am I missing - of course one should not pass off the third image as a "photograph:" It is a photo illustration, a photo montage - but it should not be called a photograph. If it is called a photograph and accepted as such by people who know what was done to it, then photographs lose all meaning as portrayals of an instant of reality. Whatever reality may be. Nice job though, Sonny! ;-) B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of geebeespaw Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 2:45 PM To: LUG Subject: [Leica] Photoshop dilemma When is a photograph not a photograph? http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/photoshop_1.html Graham http://geebeephoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html