Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity
From: Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:28:22 -0400
a little respite this week for frank et. al, who complained about all the
piercings lately.....
http://www.netaxs.com/~cassidy/col.html
as always, feel free to take me to task for whatever reason.
kc
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> (Re: [Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from Jeffery Smith <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from Jeffery Smith <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: NO SUBJECT, NO MESSAGE)
Reply from "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com> (Re: [Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com> ([Leica] NO SUBJECT, NO MESSAGE)
Reply from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Reply from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> ([Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old John Lennon)