Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:12:42 -0700
References: <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA258183D1B@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu>
 
I believe the soft effect was achieved by having two UV filters on the lens.

Outstanding photograph none the less!

:)

Jim


At 08:08 AM 4/16/2002 -0700, Steve Barbour wrote:
>Kyle...an interesting shot....I recognize my dear old Philadelphia... but 
>not the girl....
>how did you achieve the soft effect...(though with sharpness)...what lens 
>used...other
>tricks?
>
>Steve
>
>
> > a little respite this week for frank et. al, who complained about all the
> > piercings lately.....
> >
> > http://www.netaxs.com/~cassidy/col.html
> >

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
 In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)