Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi All-- I made a comment that the photographer Jeffery was referring to was "unprofessional and silly" (for not using radio remotes as opposed to slave-eyes.) I didn't realize that he was referring to a wedding in 1976. Slave units we a bit of a crap shoot back then and believe me they were mostly a hassle. Obviously, this photographer was trying to do the best job he could do by lighting it with multiple flash units. I don't think radio units were even available back then except for custom made ones. I apologize if I offended anybody. I certainly didn't mean to refer to "all" wedding photographers and in fact those of you who shoot weddings are in the toughest business there may be in photography. You have the world's most difficult to please clients, including the mother of the bride. Anyway, good shooting out there and again my apologies if I offended any of you hardworking wedding shooters. Best regards, John Fulton Fort Worth Jeffery wrote: >I did not do it as a source of fun. There were other people at the >reception with little P&S cameras too. It was not a conspiracy >against the photographer. People take pictures at wedding >receptions. There is no excuse for that? Give me a break. > >At 12:53 PM 4/14/2002 -0700, you wrote: >>Years ago when I was doing weddings this would not have happened -- >>people were more aware then of being polite and also of the expense the >>young couple was obligated to in order to have photos of their >>wedding -- the best the photographer could produce. >> >>Today, I have noticed that many people have no regard for the hired >>professional - no tolerance or patience. It seems to be a matter of >>"I'll get mine and to hell with you!". And, as was so strongly stated >>here, it seems to be fun for some to just get in the way and cause >>problems. >> >>I'm sorry, folks, but there is no excuse for that kind of thinking or >>activity. >> >>Ted in Olalla >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@markrabiner.com> >>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >>Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 11:47 AM >>Subject: Re: [Leica] A scary moment ! >> >> >>> >>> > > I shot some unofficial candids at a few weddings, and drove the >>real >>> > > photographer crazy. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > To unsubscribe, see >>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>> >>> Wedding photographers are often not so smart, rich, or tasteful. >>> Sometimes they are I'm sure not so professional. >>> >>> By the way i don't have radio slaves but will sometimes use regular >>> ones, I've done about 120 weddings in the past 25 years. Only one in >>the >>> past 5 years. >>> >>> If you're shooting Ektachrome 400 film why are you using flash? >>> >>> Especially when it screws up the professional photographers set up? >>This >>> is funny? >>> Am I on the planet Xenon? >>> Why am i the only one who sees how rude and low minded this behavior >>is? >>> >>> I say when there is a professional photographer on the premises who is >>> being paid by your host; >>> you do your best to stay out of thier way. >>> They is there to GET THE SHOT. >>> YOU can play with all the films you want. >>> >>> Rude is a word which does not come close to covering it. >>> It is certainly rude to your HOST among other things. >>> "Ungracious" is a word which comes to mind. >>> >>> What if you interfered with the preparation of the deviled eggs? Who'd >>> find that funny? >>> >>> I hope a Leica was not being used. I somehow suspect it wasn't. >>> >>> >>> Mark Rabiner >>> Portland, Oregon USA >>> http://www.markrabiner.com >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, see >>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html