Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I will be accused of being elitist but here goes. All this talk of starving students and not being able to afford equipment is just a bunch of nonsense. [Who I am talking about here are the student photographers with a fire in their soul to get into photography. Not the casual "gee photography would be a neat job" variety, nor the ones who takes a couple of photo courses for fun. I'm talking about the young men and women who wake up in the morning and all they want to do is conquer the world with their photographs.] In photography a student has to be able to compete. Not just with other students but with the pros that are out there. If a student wants to get a photographer job after college they need a portfolio and it needs to be first rate. Nobody is going to hire an emerging photographer with a second rate portfolio ("but it could have been first rate if I'd just had the proper equipment--it was just too expensive"). I have looked at hundreds of student portfolios when I was chief photographer at a major metro newspaper and also for four years, a judge for a national collegiate photojournalism competition. I can tell you I didn't give a hoot in hell about equipment or lack there-of. What I cared about was the portfolio and the photographer. Economics be damned. If you want to be a good photographer you need to get the equipment you need to get the job done. No excuses. So, there are some students with F5s, 400 2.8s etc. They have that stuff because they know they need it to compete. For what it's worth. best, John Fulton Fort Worth - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html