Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:06 AM 4/5/02 -0500, you wrote: > >They finally came out with an aperture preferred > >camera decades after they could have. They have done > >nothing to improve upon their M2 RF. and they gave up > >on long lenses after the m4-p. > >It's too little too late and they are now stuck in a > >niche market which can be taken away from them if any > >of the large mfgs ever decide to do so. The whole > >thing > >is a joke really. The M series is now as limited as it > >is irrelevant. > >Sorry > >Javier ...let's see, I have other gear that does long lenses better than Leica (M can never work with 400 f2.8 lenses) and I have now have a choice for .58, .72 and .85 viewfinders to match specific lenses. Although I never use it I have the option of TTL and auto metering. Doesn't seem limited to me. Greg Locke St. John's, Newfoundland www.greglocke.com - ----------------------------- PictureDesk International ....NEWS PICTURES ONLINE! www.pdiphotos.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html