Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The Kodachrome Solution
From: David Young <youngs@islandnet.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 09:10:19 -0800
References: <3CA9670F.4EA849F6@hale-pohaku.com> <20020401152538-r01050000-C6512889-45C7-11D6-9263-003065C7DF66-1013-010c@168.150.177.113> <20020401152538-r01050000-C6512889-45C7-11D6-9263-003065C7DF66-1 013-010c@168.150.177.113> <E16sCxs-00002g-00@mail.islandnet.com> <3CA9670F.4EA849F6@hale-pohaku.com>

Brian Reid wrote:

>Each year I am so glad when April 1 is over.

Sorry, Brian.

I know I picked an unfortunate day to post the "Kodachrome Solution" story,
but you have my word, it was not - I repeat, NOT - an April 1 story.  It is
100% true, as stated at the start.






- ----------

David Young        | Experience gained varies directly 
Victoria, CANADA   | with equipment ruined.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] The Kodachrome Solution)
Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@idea-processing.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)
Message from David Young <youngs@islandnet.com> ([Leica] The Kodachrome Solution)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] The Kodachrome Solution)