Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The Kodachrome Solution
From: David Young <youngs@islandnet.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 09:04:31 -0800
References: <20020401152538-r01050000-C6512889-45C7-11D6-9263-003065C7DF66-1013-010c@168.150.177.113> <20020401152538-r01050000-C6512889-45C7-11D6-9263-003065C7DF66-1 013-010c@168.150.177.113> <E16sCxs-00002g-00@mail.islandnet.com>

>David Young wrote:
>
>> For all those who would like to use Kodachrome, but are afraid to send it
>> to Kodak or their agents for processing, there is an alternative.

then Dennis Painter said:
>fascinating! too bad his method was not published. It's easy to wonder if
a Jobo would do it.


I fear not, Dennis.  His equipment was all home made, but formidable.  Many
tanks & drums. Tolerances were much tighter than E3/E6 for temp. and
timings, but otherwise not horrendously different.

If someone were very, *very* good, perhaps it *could* be done in a JOBO!

The worst part of all of this is that I've just gone through my box of old
photos from those years, and cannot locate the prints.  I hope they're
misplaced, not lost!  :(

- ----------

David Young        | Experience gained varies directly 
Victoria, CANADA   | with equipment ruined.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from David Young <youngs@islandnet.com> ([Leica] Re: The Kodachrome Solution)
Reply from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> ([Leica] OFFLIST Re: The Kodachrome Solution)
Reply from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: The Kodachrome Solution)
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@idea-processing.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)
Message from David Young <youngs@islandnet.com> ([Leica] The Kodachrome Solution)