Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: spelling convention
From: bachchaconne@my-deja.com
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:31:32 +0800

Well such a thread would be shorter and infinitely more on-topic than
Leni, National Socialist Party and their sympathizers/collaborators,
Scotch/whisk(e)y, the ocean, Mac OS, motor scooters, defending
software companies...ad nauseum.

Andrew

>Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: spelling convention
>From: Photo Phreak <leicam4pro@yahoo.com>
>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:20:56 -0800 (PST)
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>- --- bachchaconne@my-deja.com wrote:
>> Why Rei, are you gonna get into PENTAX because of the
>> ever-increasing
>> compatibility issues of N*k*n?
>> :)
>> (BTW, Kyocera is a "Japanese camera maker", not Contax, a
>> brand-name
>> owned by Zeiss.)
>> 
>> Andrew.
>============================================================
>
>    We could get into a long thread about "name games".  It
>does not really matter who owns the name.  Who really makes
>and SELLS them.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html