Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: spelling convention
From: bachchaconne@my-deja.com
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 03:18:12 +0800

Why Rei, are you gonna get into PENTAX because of the ever-increasing
compatibility issues of N*k*n?
:)
(BTW, Kyocera is a "Japanese camera maker", not Contax, a brand-name
owned by Zeiss.)

Andrew.

>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:52:48 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Eric's PAW week 13
>Message-ID: <200203281352.g2SDqm401925@panix1.panix.com>
>References: 
>
>i observe in polite company the convention is to expurgate
>all vowels in the names of all japanese 35mm camera makers unless
>they contain an 'X' in their name. :-)
>
>- -rei
>
>(owner of 2 n*k*n f3's, and 24/2 35/1.4 50/1.4 55/2.8 and 105/1.8 n*kk*rs.)
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Michael Abbott" <lists@mabot.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: spelling convention)