Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?
From: "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:17:27 -0800
References: <20020324101044-r01050000-754B7004-3F52-11D6-996A-003065C7DF66-1013-010c@10.0.1.27> <5.1.0.14.2.20020324143123.022375a0@infoave.net> <001d01c1d36d$df10ca00$633f4d18@gv.shawcable.net>
 
I have always equated print manipulation to a woman's make-up. A little to
enhance or accentuate is acceptable if not desirable. When the manipulation
is obvious, not only is it a failure, it becomes objectionable.

I suppose that I prefer unaltered  women.... er prints.

Joe Codispoti




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@idea-processing.com> ([Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)