Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So now Austin, your saying it depends on what the definition of "IS" is? Regards, Greg Austin Franklin wrote: >>Austin, >> >>Have you thought about calling Leica USA and asking them what their policy >>is? >> >>Bryan >> > >Hi Bryan, > >Someone in Leica MAY know, but that doesn't mean they are going to tell me >the legally correct story. As I am sure you well know, what a company says >(intentionally or unintentionally), and what their "contracts" may claim, >may or may not be entirely legal (as end user license agreements for >software has clearly shown). > >As I believe it's been posted here, though Leica MAY claim I MUST send in a >signed etc., the US law may only require I have a proof of purchase, or even >simply the serial number which shows that the item must still be under >warranty... > >I am, of course, not trying to say they, or anyone, should honor a >fraudulent claim...but if the item IS under warranty, one should not have to >"play games" to get that warranty work done, in a timely and correct manner. > >Austin > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html