Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A Second Body
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 20:06:40 -0700
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNEELBILAA.red735i@earthlink.net>

It depends. If I'm looking to get close-up to something/one small:

M5 & M6 TTL or Classic
90, 50, 35 lenses

To reach into the distance:

R8 & R7
70-180, 100, 280 lenses plus 2 X extender.

Regards,

Greg

Frank Filippone wrote:

>I was wondering what might be the LUG's (multiple) opinion about choice of a
>second body, if you carry around 2 bodies....  For the sake of clarity,
>please note your primary body as well.  For those with many bodies (
>multiple Leica disorder?), I suggest you state your combinations of bodies
>that you use...
>
>Examples:
>M2 + IIIC
>M6TTL .85  + M2
>M6 .72 + CL
>M3 + Bessa L
>
>Or whatever you like...
>
>My personal choice is 1 body... a M6TTL .72... 2 bodies is too much for my
>tourist style...
>
>Frank Filippone
>red735i@earthlink.net
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> ([Leica] A Second Body)