Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica
From: Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:30:10 -0800
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJMEMBOLAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com><003b01c1bc77$e8af0980$6501a8c0@directvinternet.com> <00e001c1bc9c$055ebf20$59005043@andrewsc>
 
Please move this thread to the LUG Forum.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)
Message from "Matthew Powell" <mlpowell@directvinternet.com> (Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)
Message from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> ([Leica] Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)