Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica
From: Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:45:41 -0800
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJMEMBOLAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <003b01c1bc77$e8af0980$6501a8c0@directvinternet.com>

Well, IMHO, Reagan did a great job of "acting" as a President.  Clinton got
disbarred.  It appears to me that Clinton couldn't even get lawyering right.
Hmmmm.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Powell" <mlpowell@directvinternet.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE:
[Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica


> > What do you mean "time will tell"?  The stock market has gone down
almost
> > %70!
>
> Which has what, really, to do with the standard of living for the average
> Joe?
>
> About 1% of United States citizens owns 50% of the stock.
>
> I think you'll find that under both the Reagan and Clinton economies,
people
> worked longer hours for less pay just to keep up.
>
> > Kids today want jobs where they can "socialize" instead of actually
> > work...it's called "teen talk time".  These kids became young adults and
> > adults during "that" (the Clinton years) time, and because of it, they
> have
> > no real sense of values.  "Hell, the President never had a real job, so
> why
> > should I".
> As opposed to Reagan, who was an *actor*?
>
> Hmmm... "real job" - actor vs. law professor...
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)
In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)
Message from "Matthew Powell" <mlpowell@directvinternet.com> (Re: WAY off topic - "over-amped" Regan/Clinton dollars - was RE: [Leica] Re: P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)