Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Patek vs Leica
From: "G. Michael Paine" <mickeyp35@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:59:39 -0800
References: <20020215023547.70832.qmail@web14003.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020215093908.03651928@pop.alink.net>
 
>At 09:12 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Mike Gil wrote:
>>Great joke Henry.  But it should be a "Rolex".
>>Somebody with BMW could not afford a Patek.
>>
>>mike
>
>
>So what is it that makes a "Patek" more expensive than Leicas, or 
>BMWs for that matter...?
>
>Jim


The price tag.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Henry Ting <henryting10@yahoo.com> ([Leica] A Joke !)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Patek vs Leica)