Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Patek vs Leica
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:41:06 -0800
References: <20020215023547.70832.qmail@web14003.mail.yahoo.com>
 
At 09:12 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Mike Gil wrote:
>Great joke Henry.  But it should be a "Rolex".
>Somebody with BMW could not afford a Patek.
>
>mike


So what is it that makes a "Patek" more expensive than Leicas, or BMWs for 
that matter...?

Jim

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from "G. Michael Paine" <mickeyp35@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Re: Patek vs Leica)
 In reply to: Message from Henry Ting <henryting10@yahoo.com> ([Leica] A Joke !)