Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Javad: Erwin Puts warns about comparing lenses of drastically different focal lengths. It is at the bottom of the report linked below: http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/mseries/testm/M28-24.html To Quote Erwin Puts: "Many users could make a small mistake when comparing lenses. If you would use a Summicron-M 50mm and a Elmarit-M 24 mm side by side and take pictures of the same object at the same distance the Summicron will win. Simply a matter of magnification. As the focal length of the E is half the one of the S any small detail that is reproduced by the E is also reduced twice in comparison to the S. So detail rendition of the S is invariably better. The meaningful comparison would be to take pictures at 100x the focal length and then you will notice that the E is almost equal to the S." Regards, Robert At 02:04 PM 2/13/2002 +0100, Javad Fatemi wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I'm using R8 with APO 2.8 100 and APO 2.8 180. These are very nice and >sharp lenses. In the last two week I had the chance to test a M6 with >Summilux 1.4 35 ASPH. And somehow are the pictures sharper than the >pictures with my new Elmarit 2.8 19. My question is that this is a >general thing? I was wondering how big the difference between the >pictures from 19 and 35 were!!! > > >Regards > >Javad Fatemi > >***************************************** >GFI Fax & Voice GmbH >Technical Department >Email: jfatemi@gfisoftware.de >Internet: http://www.gfisoftware.de >Tel: +49-40-3068100 >Fax: +49-40-306810-10 >***************************************** >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html