Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: war/ was rude
From: "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:13:10 -0000
References: <a.1998ae93.2991866b@aol.com>

> War photography is great if you're sitting on your arse looking at a
coffee
> book or standing in some brightly lit museum eating goose pate and finger
> food.  Safe and warm, one can politely critique the eloquence of the
vision,
> the bravery of the photographer, the essence of a "decisive" moment.
>
> On the other hand, war, like any form of violence, isn't so glorious or
> beautiful if you're on the receiving end, a fact that any number of
Luggers
> on this list can probably attest to.
>
> I suppose for some the "main event" in life is to celebrate Man's blood
lust.
>  For me, I prefer lust without the blood.
>
> -kim

Or as Roger Waters puts it  "The bravery of being out of range". Track 5
"Amused to Death"


Graham

http://geebeespaw.users.btopenworld.com/






- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Re: war/ was rude)