Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bill: I like the idea of the Tri-Elmar, but I use the M for the fast lenses and the incredible quality of the images produced. If you read Erwin's report he says the Tri-Elmar is not up to the level of the current lenses. I just love the look of the images from the 35mm Summicron ASPH and the 50mm Summicron. I almost never use a 28mm even on my R8, so the Tri-Elmar are the wrong three for me. Perhaps if it was 35-50-70 and a touch faster. Regards, Robert At 09:13 AM 2/4/2002 -0600, Bill Satterfield wrote: >One more thought. Since I took my trip, I bought a 3E but the f/4 would >be a limitation in the museums where you will need at least a f/2. The 3E >might work, I do not know. The 3E would be great for outside scenes. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html