Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Four Categories of high definition developers
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:43:18 -0500
References: <3.0.5.32.20020108221326.007cbbb0@mail.bellsouth.net> <3C3BBC81.8DCB128F@markrabiner.com>

I remember you said you did a lot of Panatomic X with D-23 back then too.
How did this compare to the other two in terms of tonality?  Did each have
its particular purpose?

Mike D

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@markrabiner.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Four Categories of high definition developers


> I did a lot of moving back and forth between Beutlers and Rodinal 1:100
> with Panatomic X and Tri X in the late 70's early 80's.
> The Beutlers was just as high Acutance i think as the Rodinal but was
> very smooth and much less grain.
> But sometimes I'd go to the Rodinal for the etched look.
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.markrabiner.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Four Categories of high definition developers)
In reply to: Message from John Hicks <jhicks31@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] Four Categories of high definition developers)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Four Categories of high definition developers)