Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]><Snip> > At some point in trying TFX-2 I directly compared it to Rodinal 1:100 > both with printing and examining the negs at 30X; results were, to my eyes, > identical so I didn't see any point in continuing with TFX-2 rather than > Rodinal, which I always have on hand. > > John Hicks > jhicks31@bellsouth.net > I did a lot of moving back and forth between Beutlers and Rodinal 1:100 with Panatomic X and Tri X in the late 70's early 80's. The Beutlers was just as high Acutance i think as the Rodinal but was very smooth and much less grain. But sometimes I'd go to the Rodinal for the etched look. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.markrabiner.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html