Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit
From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:03:11 -0600
References: <000501c19733$81977e80$0200a8c0@mediaone.net> <003d01c19792$6782a880$8c5bfea9@dan14dyp3s7zcg> <001901c197ca$ea3c68a0$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com> <3C3A2D10.95339817@earthlink.net> <025201c197d8$56549b40$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com> <3C3A420A.3373DE8A@earthlink.net> <001001c197e1$f6784f00$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com> <3C3A4BB6.7BAC1783@earthlink.net> <3C3A5DEB.6C5F092D@markrabiner.com>
Yeah, this wins a prize for the most posts from people who do not regularly
shoot with a lens who have firm convictions about that lens and its
performance.
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
> This wins first prize for more ">>>>>>>'s" than any post I've seen!
>
> :)
> Mark the snippy guy Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.markrabiner.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Stephen Gandy <leicanikon@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
In reply to:
Message from "tlianza" <tlianza@mediaone.net> ([Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from Stephen Gandy <leicanikon@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from Stephen Gandy <leicanikon@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from Stephen Gandy <leicanikon@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] tele-elmarit)